YOUR HFA IMPLEMENTATION JOURNEY

Arc 0: Why HFA > Arc 1: 1st Base > Arc 2: 2nd Base > Arc 3: 3rd Base > Arc 4: Hiring > Arc 5: Culture > Arc 6: Evidence > Arc 7: Integration

Post 7 of 48 · You're in Arc 1: 1st Base: Principled Decisions

The 10% Edge

Nobody notices a 10% better decision. Everybody notices a year of them.

A line chart drawn in engraved style: two nearly-parallel lines diverging slowly over a year until the gap is dramatic; small baseball-diamond motif at the origin. Navy/gold/cream.

Billy Beane's A's didn't win on home runs. They won on a small statistical edge — a few percentage points of on-base percentage — applied relentlessly across thousands of plate appearances. No single at-bat looked different. The season did.

Decisions compound the same way. A leader makes hundreds of meaningful calls a year — hires, prices, priorities, hard conversations. Run them through a principled process and the research-backed result is roughly a ten percent improvement in decision quality. Ten percent sounds modest. It isn't. A slightly better hire stays a year longer. A slightly better-handled conflict doesn't metastasize. A slightly more honest price keeps a customer a decade. Multiply a small edge by a year of choices and you've changed the enterprise; multiply it by a career and you've changed a community.

But — and this is the whole game — an edge you don't measure is an edge you don't keep. The loud noise version of this is an enterprise that hums along, scorecard green, with decision quality left entirely to instinct. The quiet noise version is a leader who deeply believes in principled decisions and couldn't tell you the last time he actually ran the process.

So make it binary and make it weekly: add a PDM column to your scorecard. Did the significant decisions this week go through the chart — yes or no? Not 'were they good decisions' — that's a lagging indicator you'll argue about. Just: did we run the process? On-base percentage, not highlight reels. The habit is the edge.

This week's prompt: "Where have you seen the compound effect — one modestly better decision that paid off far beyond its size months or years later? Or the reverse: a small unprincipled call that compounded into something expensive?"

What would your enterprise look like if every significant decision this year had been 10% better?

Try This

Add one row to your scorecard this week: 'Significant decisions run through PDM — Y/N.' Binary, weekly, owned by you. Don't debate decision quality in the L10; just track whether the process ran. Give it thirteen weeks before you judge it.

This Week's Tool

Name: PrincipledDecisions.AI

Link: https://principleddecisions.ai

Your Move

Put the PDM row on your scorecard before Friday, and try PrincipledDecisions.AI on one live decision — it walks you through stakeholders, dignity, and common good in minutes.

Go Deeper

Know a leader who needs this? Forward this email — they can subscribe here: https://cimastrategic.com/hfa

The Mission & Traction Implementation Series: one step per week for 48 weeks. New subscribers start from Week 1.

Links: Cima | Authentic Leader Forums | ALF | ILN Blog

Copyright © {{right_now.year}}  {{location.name}}, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
{{location.email}}

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can unsubscribe from this list.

ALF
ALF
ALF
ALF
Forums
Cima
ILN